On Air Now

The Chill Out Zone

10:00pm - Midnight

  • 01723 336444

Now Playing

Solar Farm to be Built Near Seamer Could Power over 9,000 Homes

Wednesday, 13 July 2022 13:32

By Anttoni James Numminen, Local Democracy Reporter

Scarborough Borough Council has approved plans for a major new solar farm project to be located in the borough.

The project was approved by Scarborough Council on Monday 11 July and it will allow Voltalia UK Ltd to progress with its plans for a large-scale solar farm.

The project will see a 28.5 hectare solar farm – equivalent to the size of approximately 50 football pitches – located on undeveloped land off Stoney Haggs Road, Seamer.

According to Voltalia, a French renewable energy company, the solar farm could generate enough energy to provide electricity to meet the demand of up to 9,600 homes.

As each megawatt (MW) of output can power around 300 homes, this could result in savings of over 13,500 tonnes of CO2 per year, based on data from the Solar Trade Association.

According to a report by Scarborough Borough Council.

“The most dominant feature of the development would be the solar panels which would be repeated in rows or arrays, individually up to 380m in length”,

“It is the intention that the solar panels and associated equipment would be ‘temporary’, remaining in situ for 35 years following the site becoming operational”

The electricity would be fed into the national grid rather than providing power directly to local homes and businesses.

Of the 87 residents who provided feedback on the plans, 68 were in favour of the proposal while eight objected and seven were “neutral”.

Many of the objections raised by members of the public addressed concerns about the solar farm’s impact on natural views, the surrounding ecology including trees and soil, as well as possible “glare” from the solar panels affecting drivers.

However, the council has set conditions for the approval of the plans, which include a clause that there will be no loss of trees or hedgerows, while also noting that less than two per cent of the land is classed as “best and most suitable” for agricultural purposes.

Council officers said concerns about views and ecology “need to be balanced against the substantial amount of planting to be provided on-site, so it is not a significant concern.”

They added:

“It is fair to say that any large-scale solar farm project in the borough would have some negative visual impact. There may be wider flat landscapes elsewhere in the country where planting might be able to negate adverse impacts.”

Subject to conditions, no objections were received from the Environment Agency, Yorkshire Water, the Parks & Countryside Service, nor the Ministry of Defence or GCHQ Scarborough, both of which have signals intelligence bases in the vicinity of the area.

Although a geophysical survey indicated archaeological features in the area, including a potential Neolithic henge, Bronze Age burial mounds, and an Iron Age square barrow, following the completion of trial trenching the applicants amended the plan to avoid “key areas of interest”.

Many of the supporting arguments put forth by the developer cited the council’s 2019 declaration of a climate emergency and the need to reduce carbon emissions.

The council’s report states that

“documents submitted with the application make much of national, international and local commitments to reducing the impact of climate change and increasing the supply of energy from renewable and low carbon sources.”

“This includes the government’s net-zero target of a 100% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 compared to 1990.”

However, one public objector said:

“If the council has a climate emergency target, a brownfield site should have been identified away from houses.”

Some bungalows would be “50 metres at closest” to the arrays while a dwelling at Eastgate House would be 325m away.

The council said that other potential sites would have had a greater impact on the visual and natural environment.

Several conditions were set by the council and must be met for the development to go ahead.

These include requirements to protect surrounding nature, limiting the project to a period of 35 years from the date of the development becoming operational, and having to seek further advice from the planning authority starting “in the first year of operation”.

 

Did you find this article useful?

This is the Coast is committed to providing a daily local news service for the Yorkshire Coast. We are a small locally owned and operated business which employs professional journalists and reporters. We do not receive any public funding or grants and we are entirely funded by our local commercial operations. We enjoy fabulous support from local businesses who work with us on their advertising and marketing campaigns, but the cost of providing high quality, well researched, fact checked local news coverage is significant.

If you appreciate what This is the Coast does, and would like to help support our journalism, please consider supporting us on a monthly basis today.

A small contribution from all our readers would really help support independent journalism for the Yorkshire Coast.

More from Yorkshire Coast News

Comments

Add a comment

Log in to the club or enter your details below.

Follow Us

Get Our Apps

Our Apps are now available for iOS, Android and Smart Speakers.

  • Available on the App Store
  • Available on Google Play
  • Just ask Amazon Alexa
  • Available on Roku

Today's Weather

  • Scarborough

    Sunny

    High: 10°C | Low: 3°C

  • Filey

    Sunny intervals

    High: 11°C | Low: 1°C

  • Whitby

    Sunny

    High: 10°C | Low: 0°C

  • Bridlington

    Sunny intervals

    High: 10°C | Low: 2°C

  • Hornsea

    Sunny intervals

    High: 12°C | Low: 2°C

  • Driffield

    Sunny intervals

    High: 12°C | Low: 2°C

News