On Air Now

The Chill Out Zone

10:00pm - Midnight

  • 01723 336444

Now Playing

En Vogue

Don't Let Go (Love)

Download

Sandsend Shepherd’s Hut Plan Rejected Over Highway Safety Concerns

Friday, 24 January 2025 16:17

By Anttoni James Numminen, Local Democracy Reporter

Plans for a holiday shepherd’s hut, car parking, and a shed in Sandsend near Whitby have been rejected by the council as an ‘unacceptable’ proposal.

The application on behalf of The Mulgrave Estate was rejected by North Yorkshire Council planners on Thursday, January 23.

The site, which is located on High Row, lies within the development limit of Sandsend and its conservation area.

The grassed former garden is an area of around 300 square metres.

If the scheme had been approved, the shepherd’s hut would have been located near the front of the application site and would have been accessed from the car park area by a resin-bound path leading to timber steps.

The short-term holiday let would have measured around 12 square metres and would have had a bedroom, a kitchen and living area and a toilet and shower.

Planning officers said that despite being visible from some public viewpoints, its design and scale meant it would “fit into its setting and be unobtrusive”.

No objections to the proposal were made by Lythe Parish Council, NYC’s housing Standards team, or environmental health officers.

However, the Highway Authority (HA) recommended refusal of the plan due to “an unacceptable intensification of use”.

It raised concerns that “adequate visibility is not available at the junction of High Row and the A174”.

The HA also said that because of its “insufficient width of 40 to 70 centimetres, the A174 footway at Lythe Bank is unsuitable for pedestrian use which would be likely to be generated by the proposal”.

A report by the planning authority said that due to the position and design of the shepherd’s hut, it would have had “no detrimental impact on residential amenity”.

However, officers agreed with concerns raised by the Highway Authority and said the plan “should be refused on the basis that the proposal does not comply with the highway and pedestrian safety requirements” of the council.

A report concluded: “The existing access, by which vehicles associated with this proposal would leave and rejoin the public highway, is unsatisfactory […] and the intensification of use is unacceptable in terms of highway safety.”

Did you find this article useful?

This is the Coast is committed to providing a daily local news service for the Yorkshire Coast. We are a small locally owned and operated business which employs professional journalists and reporters. We do not receive any public funding or grants and we are entirely funded by our local commercial operations. We enjoy fabulous support from local businesses who work with us on their advertising and marketing campaigns, but the cost of providing high quality, well researched, fact checked local news coverage is significant.

If you appreciate what This is the Coast does, and would like to help support our journalism, please consider supporting us on a monthly basis today.

A small contribution from all our readers would really help support independent journalism for the Yorkshire Coast.

More from Yorkshire Coast News

Comments

Add a comment

Log in to the club or enter your details below.

Follow Us

Get Our Apps

Our Apps are now available for iOS, Android and Smart Speakers.

  • Available on the App Store
  • Available on Google Play
  • Just ask Amazon Alexa
  • Available on Roku

Today's Weather

  • Scarborough

    Medium-level cloud

    High: 9°C | Low: 1°C

  • Filey

    Medium-level cloud

    High: 9°C | Low: 1°C

  • Whitby

    Sunny intervals

    High: 9°C | Low: 1°C

  • Bridlington

    Medium-level cloud

    High: 10°C | Low: 1°C

  • Hornsea

    Sunny intervals

    High: 10°C | Low: 1°C

  • Driffield

    Medium-level cloud

    High: 9°C | Low: 1°C

News